By Judith Amondi
Sexual reproductive health rights are a critical component to the general wellbeing of people and having this sector paralyzed not only affects the nation but narrows down to the individual level.
The executive order to begin the withdrawal process of the United States from the World Health Organization not only stagnates but derails the progress achieved over time in ensuring every person enjoys their reproductive health rights freely and in the most accessible and sustainable manner. However, the impact on the marginalized communities in low-income countries can be felt, as they already face significant barriers to accessing healthcare and this move will disproportionately affect them.
Global health, including maternal health, HIV/AIDs, STI treatment, and access to basic health services and information related to Sexual Reproductive Health will no longer be a priority, further stigmatizing a wide variety of essential services. Being a country dependent on various donor support from the United States like; the supply of drugs such as antiretroviral medication, contraceptives, and funding to support Sexual Reproductive health-related programs, it comes as a huge blow.
The National Guideline for self-care in Reproductive Health takes both a people-centered and health systems approach that seeks to ensure quality in self-care for all, including special populations, in regards to access to support from healthcare providers and suppliers both in the public and private sectors. This is in line with the WHO guidelines on self-care interventions for health and wellbeing in the 2022 revision.
It’s times like this that make us critically reflect and analyze the value of independence and self-sustainability. As a nation, we hope to rise above this, though it seems like a pipe dream. It serves as a wakeup call for every individual to take up the role of ensuring they stay healthy and make informed choices on Sexual Reproductive Health and their lifestyle in totality.
Judith is a NAYA youth advocate.
